What if bondage was fashionable?
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2022 11:53 am
In response to this miniature, someone (not sure if you want to be named here?) asked me to elaborate a bit on the scenario: What if bondage was fashionable?
You might know the somewhat similar idea of Restraint World, where women have to be tied up in public, by law. Here, it's different. You can go out unfettered if you like, but you might feel awkward among all the other tied-up people.
I don't think it's all that unrealistic. Look at us on Earth. People wear high-heels which are bad for your back and you almost can't walk in them. People wear corsets, all kind of piercings in any body part, there are those who put plates in their lips, stretch their necks very long with special rings, mutilate their feet or even genitals. A little bit of bondage pales in comparison to such customs!
Children learn it from earliest youth. Just as our little girls play with dressing up, doing their hair, or experimenting with make-up, they would start tying each other up. The basic rules of bondage safety are learned early and always respected: Nothing around the neck, no numb hands, safewords, etc.
Bondage is originally a status symbol. If you're tied up, you're signalling that you don't have to do manual labour. The stricter and more elaborate the bondage, the better. I'd like to see an opera audience!
I imagine a teenager girl dressing up for a party, and then asking her mother or sibling: "Awww, can't you tie me up a little tighter? I can't be the only one with just her hands tied behind her back!" And then she is happily put into a tight torso harness with her hands strictly tied crossed between her shoulder blades, or behind her head. She looks at herself in the mirror and admires the effect this has on her breasts.
Casual bondage at a party?
For the drinks, you will have a straw. For the food, you help each other. But what if you need to go to the bathroom? At the opera, there could be bathroom assistants who will undress your nether parts before the motion. The toilet has a washing function, like they do in Japan or Finland. Afterwards, the assistants redress you and retie a possible crotch rope.
At a teenager party, if they cannot afford hiring bathroom assistants, well, somebody needs to dial back in their bondage, to be able to help the others. It's like the one who cannot drink alcohol because he will drive home. So, your friend who only wears handcuffs in front is the one who accompanies you to the bathroom.
A bondage party is so much fun, you can chat, you can dance...
Of course, a tied woman is not at all a prisoner. They are totally emancipated, in fact their prime minister is a woman. I imagine their neigbour country, where women aren't legally allowed to wear clothes (I think I read something like that in the CMNF biotope), what would happen if their prime ministers met for a state visit? And the two prime ministers look a bit like Kaja Kallas and Sanna Marin (the prime ministers of Estonia and Finland)? Would they both be tied up naked, and one of them would feel a little bit weird because of the nudity, and the other one because of the bondage? Would they distort for the obligate handshake, with their hands tightly tied behind their backs, or replace it by little kisses on the cheek?
Come to think of it, why should only women have the bondage fun; men can be tied up just the same, right?
Any more ideas for this idyllic scenario?
You might know the somewhat similar idea of Restraint World, where women have to be tied up in public, by law. Here, it's different. You can go out unfettered if you like, but you might feel awkward among all the other tied-up people.
I don't think it's all that unrealistic. Look at us on Earth. People wear high-heels which are bad for your back and you almost can't walk in them. People wear corsets, all kind of piercings in any body part, there are those who put plates in their lips, stretch their necks very long with special rings, mutilate their feet or even genitals. A little bit of bondage pales in comparison to such customs!
Children learn it from earliest youth. Just as our little girls play with dressing up, doing their hair, or experimenting with make-up, they would start tying each other up. The basic rules of bondage safety are learned early and always respected: Nothing around the neck, no numb hands, safewords, etc.
Bondage is originally a status symbol. If you're tied up, you're signalling that you don't have to do manual labour. The stricter and more elaborate the bondage, the better. I'd like to see an opera audience!
I imagine a teenager girl dressing up for a party, and then asking her mother or sibling: "Awww, can't you tie me up a little tighter? I can't be the only one with just her hands tied behind her back!" And then she is happily put into a tight torso harness with her hands strictly tied crossed between her shoulder blades, or behind her head. She looks at herself in the mirror and admires the effect this has on her breasts.
Casual bondage at a party?
For the drinks, you will have a straw. For the food, you help each other. But what if you need to go to the bathroom? At the opera, there could be bathroom assistants who will undress your nether parts before the motion. The toilet has a washing function, like they do in Japan or Finland. Afterwards, the assistants redress you and retie a possible crotch rope.
At a teenager party, if they cannot afford hiring bathroom assistants, well, somebody needs to dial back in their bondage, to be able to help the others. It's like the one who cannot drink alcohol because he will drive home. So, your friend who only wears handcuffs in front is the one who accompanies you to the bathroom.
A bondage party is so much fun, you can chat, you can dance...
Of course, a tied woman is not at all a prisoner. They are totally emancipated, in fact their prime minister is a woman. I imagine their neigbour country, where women aren't legally allowed to wear clothes (I think I read something like that in the CMNF biotope), what would happen if their prime ministers met for a state visit? And the two prime ministers look a bit like Kaja Kallas and Sanna Marin (the prime ministers of Estonia and Finland)? Would they both be tied up naked, and one of them would feel a little bit weird because of the nudity, and the other one because of the bondage? Would they distort for the obligate handshake, with their hands tightly tied behind their backs, or replace it by little kisses on the cheek?
Come to think of it, why should only women have the bondage fun; men can be tied up just the same, right?
Any more ideas for this idyllic scenario?